Approaching Toronto, pre-winter

(having just read Erik Rutherford’s very inter­est­ing piece about Toronto in uTOpia, I recalled my own account of encoun­ter­ing Toronto, writ­ten some years ago for Geist 51. It was called Other City, Big City)

On the last day of Octo­ber in Toronto a man in an art gallery said: “Show­ers should be coming in around 4 p.m. They don’t always get it down to the hour like that.” He was talk­ing about the weather report on the radio. “The last real winter we had here was 1993,” he said. “Most people in this city don’t know what winter is. Ninety-​two was big, but it was noth­ing. No one has any idea.” I was not from Toronto and I had never been there in the winter, so I couldn’t be faulted for not know­ing what real winter is in Toronto. Never­the­less I could see that know­ing what real winter is would be a sign of belong­ing, of having a deeper claim on a city that lies open but veiled before the visi­tor or even the less well-​informed resi­dent. There could be no argu­ment with the man in the art gallery, who was profoundly a denizen of the city, an indweller of a place; his easy confi­dence allowed me to glimpse my own status as an outsider. In a new city, every­one you meet partakes of this qual­ity of the denizen, of the holder of a secret: they deport them­selves “natu­rally” with­out appar­ent self-​consciousness, cross­ing streets and walk­ing along side­walks, rather as chil­dren in Quebec are able (mirac­u­lously) to speak French with­out having to think about it. The man in the art gallery was also making a kind of promise: the city has a heart, he seemed to be saying, an under­ly­ing truth that can be imputed, inferred, derived, deduced, if not embraced.

For is it not true that we wish to be loved by cities, to be claimed and to be wooed by them, as soon as we enter their precincts? (Is this not the danger of cities?) I had been in Toronto for a single day and could still detect the aura that clings to the merest details of cities when they are new (or is newfan­gled a better word?): street signs are cast in a pecu­liar type­face and placed in odd posi­tions at inter­sec­tions; corner grocery stores have a more crum­pled look than in the city we know as home; even cartons of milk are of an unusual colour and every­where there are elec­tion signs (it was Halloween and the civic elec­tion campaign was under­way) propped in shop windows and stuck on lawns: yellow, blue, red, green, a spec­trum of mean­ings with­held from the outsider, hidden away in banal slogans: A Strong Voice, Expe­ri­ence that Works, The City Needs It, A Proven Record: messages encoded in the local, inde­ci­pher­able to the outsider. Indeed, in new cities every­thing partakes of the exotic. The seats on the street­cars are inches lower than the seats on the buses at home: upon first sitting down, one falls into the seat, a clear sign to other riders that an outsider is among them (in Ottawa the esca­la­tors, which move at terrific speeds, force newcom­ers to fight for balance). In the new city, buses, police cars, taxi­cabs are all the wrong colour (you laugh at the solip­sism but remain uneasy: what obscure sophis­ti­ca­tion might these newfan­gled colours imply?). We are confused by the proto­cols of the subway, the ungen­er­ous trans­fer system that refuses to let you go back or get on where you like (with the result that your pock­ets are always full of loonies and toonies and quar­ters: you will not be caught out with­out exact change). At cross­walks you are required to thrust out a hand and point if you wish to cross the street: this is too much for newcom­ers, who refuse to humil­i­ate them­selves and so cross only in the middle of the block (for how many hours or days will they retain their dignity in this way?). Other cities are an oppor­tu­nity to put one’s being into question.

Walter Benjamin reminds us that the first glimpse of a town in a land­scape is incom­pa­ra­ble and irre­triev­able, made so by the rigor­ous connec­tion between fore­ground and distance: habit has not yet done its work. As soon as we begin to find our bear­ings, the land­scape vanishes; here we might say that the cityscape vanishes into the city as soon as it becomes famil­iar (and there­fore invis­i­ble); once we can find our way, the first glimpse will never be restored. On the first day the fore­ground is filled with partic­u­lars: the grime in the street, the gravel in the ravine through which a rail line has been cut, appear to belong only here, to Toronto: even the cracks in the side­walk are highly specific. The air is filled with light, but it is a thin light that reminds one of milk diluted with water.

These are partic­u­lars of the new city: the man in the art gallery has long ceased to be aware of them. I do not think of telling him this. I walk for miles along down­town streets and the down­town seems never to end: now I feel the great plea­sure of strolling in great cities, of observ­ing and being observed, of having no desti­na­tion, of submit­ting to the monot­o­nous, fasci­nat­ing, constantly unrolling band of asphalt. Now the new city has become a big city, and the promise of the big city carries its own exhil­a­ra­tion: look in any direc­tion and there is no end to it, no visi­ble edge. In Vancou­ver you can see out of the city from almost anywhere; you are never surrounded, ensconced; but here in Toronto there is no outside (in Saska­toon it is always a surprise to look down a street and see the prairie right there, a few blocks away). Here is some­thing more of the big city, then: the big city is everywhere.

Other cities, big cities: soon every­thing fades; the famil­iar approaches too rapidly. Street names devolve into hollow signi­fiers where for a moment lay mystery: Queen, King, Spad­ina, Bathurst, Ronces­valles, Carlaw, Logan, Avenue Road, Mount Pleas­ant, the long vowels of Bloor and the strange spelling of Yonge. An enor­mous over­head sign on the free­way demands the full atten­tion of all who pass by: DO NOT ALLOW YOURSELF TO BE DISTRACTED WHILE DRIVING SAFELY. Here too, for a moment, mean­ing is proposed: a vesti­gial trace of pater­nal­ism, of the Pres­by­ter­ian Church perhaps; soon you will not think of it again.

On my last night in Toronto, a friend who has lived there for thirty years drove me across the city to where I was stay­ing on the west side, and we drove and drove and talked and looked out at the street, and even­tu­ally we were driving up and down steep curv­ing streets that wound around and into each other, and my friend confessed happily that he was completely lost: this had never happened to him before. He contin­ued driving and look­ing at street names, none of which were famil­iar to him and nor were they to me; we carried on blindly in the strange, labyrinthine neigh­bour­hood, and for a time we were absorbed into the city, which lay all around us, unknown and unap­proach­able, a secret that we had both forgot­ten to be there, await­ing us.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

Connect with Facebook

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>